NEW YORK — Concern is growing in New York’s Bangladeshi community over the disappearance of Kazi Azizul Haque Khokon, who has reportedly been missing for the past three days. Khokon lived alone at his home in Kew Gardens, Queens, and was well known within the Bangladeshi community in Jackson Heights. Friends and acquaintances regularly saw him in Jackson Heights, where he worked at Obokash Store, located near Khamarbari Grocery and Nabanna Restaurant.

People close to Khokon became increasingly concerned after he failed to report to work for three consecutive days. Khokon has also been involved in politics and is known as a leader of the Awami League and president of the US Sramik League. Md. Hamid, publicity secretary of the US Awami League, confirmed Khokon’s disappearance.

According to people familiar with the situation, local police went to Khokon’s residence in Kew Gardens and entered after breaking open the door, but they reportedly found no trace of him.

Awami League adviser Dr. Masuduzzaman has also reportedly contacted several hospitals in an effort to locate Khokon. However, there has been no confirmed information about his whereabouts so far.

The disappearance has caused concern among members and supporters of the US Awami League. Dr. Siddiqur Rahman, president of the US Awami League, said he had learned about the incident shortly before speaking and was heading to Jackson Heights to gather more information.

Khokon reportedly came to the United States about 30 years ago. His family home is in Magura District, Bangladesh. People involved in the search have also been attempting to contact Rana, the owner of Obokash Store.

There has also been speculation among some people that Khokon may have been detained or arrested by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). However, there is currently no official confirmation from ICE, police, or other law enforcement authorities that he has been detained or arrested.

Khokon’s family, coworkers, friends and community members are appealing for assistance in locating him. Anyone with reliable information about his whereabouts is urged to contact the appropriate law enforcement authorities or people close to the family.

Shibbir Ahmed, Washington DC — Republicans are navigating an increasingly complicated political debate over immigration as the 2026 midterm elections approach, with some GOP candidates seeking to distance themselves from aspects of the Trump administration’s enforcement policies while other Republicans continue to emphasize border security. Immigration has been a central issue for the Republican Party during President Donald Trump’s administration. However, recent reporting and polling suggest that the issue is not carrying the same level of attention among voters that it did during the 2024 presidential election cycle.

An Axios report published October 1 said immigration had fallen behind the cost of living as a leading concern among voters. The report also noted that polling on which party voters trust more to handle immigration has produced differing results. The changing political environment has created challenges for Republican candidates in competitive races. Several GOP lawmakers have publicly sought to distinguish their campaigns from some of the administration’s immigration enforcement measures.

Among them is Rep. Maria Elvira Salazar, R-Fla., who said in a September campaign advertisement that some of the administration’s immigration enforcement efforts had “gone too far.” Her position has become an example of the differing approaches emerging within the Republican Party as candidates prepare for November’s elections. Other Republican candidates have similarly faced pressure to address concerns about immigration enforcement while maintaining the party’s longstanding emphasis on border security.

White House border czar Tom Homan has criticized Republicans who are distancing themselves from Immigration and Customs Enforcement operations. According to the Washington Examiner, Homan urged Republican lawmakers and candidates to engage directly with ICE and address their concerns. The debate comes as the Trump administration continues to defend its immigration record. The White House has argued that stricter enforcement has reduced illegal immigration and increased border security.

For Republican candidates, immigration therefore presents competing political considerations: maintaining support among voters who prioritize border enforcement while addressing concerns among voters who oppose or question particular enforcement practices. The issue is also intersecting with broader voter concerns about the economy and the cost of living. Recent reporting suggests that those economic issues are receiving greater attention from voters as the midterm elections draw closer.

With the November 2026 elections approaching, Republican candidates are continuing to shape their immigration messages around the political and demographic circumstances of their individual districts and states. The evolving debate illustrates how immigration remains an important issue within the Republican Party while candidates differ over how prominently to feature the Trump administration’s enforcement policies in their campaigns.