Shibbir Ahmed, WASHINGTON DC: The Trump administration is planning to sell Israel a $2.8 billion package of munitions, including tens of thousands of 2,000-pound bombs, according to a U.S. official familiar with the proposed sale. The package would include 20,000 MK-84 bombs and 20,000 BLU-117 bombs, both weighing 2,000 pounds, according to the official.

The proposed sale has been informally communicated to congressional committees that review major U.S. arms transfers, but the deal has not yet been publicly announced by the State Department. The Israeli Embassy in Washington also had not publicly commented on the proposal as of Tuesday.

The planned weapons transfer comes as the United States continues its military and security partnership with Israel amid ongoing conflicts and heightened tensions across the Middle East.

Israel has used similar heavy munitions in its military operations in Gaza and Lebanon. Their use in densely populated areas has drawn scrutiny from human rights experts because of the potential for significant civilian casualties.

The proposed sale also comes amid debate in the United States over Washington’s military support for Israel. Reuters reported that a 2026 public opinion poll found an increasing share of Americans believe U.S. support for Israel has gone too far, with the shift particularly pronounced among Democrats.

The proposed $2.8 billion package would represent a significant addition to Israel’s stock of heavy U.S.-made munitions. However, the plan remains subject to the U.S. arms-sale process and congressional review.

The proposal comes as the wider Middle East remains under heightened military tension following the U.S.-Israeli conflict with Iran earlier this year and continuing violence in the region.

Shibbir Ahmed, WASHINGTON DC: The U.S. Senate on Tuesday blocked legislation that would establish a comprehensive federal regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies, dealing a major setback to the digital-asset industry and Republican lawmakers who had championed the bill. The Clarity Act failed to secure the 60 votes needed to advance, with senators voting 49-50 on the procedural measure, according to the Associated Press.

The legislation was designed to provide clearer rules for the $2.3 trillion U.S. cryptocurrency market, including defining regulatory responsibilities and establishing greater legal certainty for digital-asset companies. Crypto industry groups had strongly backed the measure and spent hundreds of millions of dollars lobbying for its passage.

Democrats opposed advancing the bill without stronger restrictions concerning President Donald Trump and his family’s financial interests in cryptocurrency. Trump and his family have significant business interests in the sector, including World Liberty Financial and a cryptocurrency meme coin.

Republicans had revised the legislation in an effort to address those concerns. The revised version included provisions giving state attorneys general greater enforcement authority and requiring public officials with significant interests in crypto-related companies to divest those interests or place them in blind trusts. Democrats argued that the changes did not go far enough.

The bill also faced concerns from the banking industry over provisions involving stablecoins, which allow certain digital tokens to maintain a value linked to traditional currencies. Banking groups warned that stablecoin rewards could encourage customers to move deposits away from banks and potentially affect lending.

The Senate’s action represents a significant setback for the cryptocurrency industry’s effort to secure its first comprehensive federal regulatory framework. Reuters reported that the legislation now faces limited prospects for revival in the near term, particularly with Congress approaching the November midterm elections and a recess.

Financial markets reacted to the Senate vote. Bitcoin fell about 4% to around $75,908, while shares of cryptocurrency companies Coinbase and Circle each declined roughly 9%, according to Reuters.

The Securities and Exchange Commission and Commodity Futures Trading Commission have meanwhile continued developing cryptocurrency-related rules, but industry participants have argued that legislation from Congress is needed to provide a more permanent regulatory framework.

Shibbir Ahmed, WASHINGTON DC — The White House highlighted a series of actions and announcements this week, including President Donald Trump’s participation in events marking the 25th anniversary of the September 11 attacks, a proposed $5,000 payment for American adults, Obamacare refunds, new trade measures involving Canada and initiatives involving veterans and U.S. manufacturing.

Trump participated in a September 8 White House ceremony marking the 25th anniversary of the September 11 attacks and later issued a presidential proclamation recognizing September 11 as Patriot Day. The White House also announced that Americans can request a September 11 Remembrance Card commemorating the anniversary.

On September 10, Trump announced what he called the “Trump Dividend,” proposing a $5,000 payment to every American adult if Republicans retain control of both the House of Representatives and Senate in the November midterm elections. Trump linked the proposed payment to revenue from tariffs and the administration’s economic policies. The proposal has raised questions about its funding, legal authority and potential effect on the federal deficit.

The administration also announced $500 refunds for nearly 1 million people enrolled in Affordable Care Act health insurance plans across 30 states. The White House said the refunds would return what it characterized as excess Obamacare exchange fees collected under the previous administration. Reuters reported that the payments are expected to begin in the coming weeks.

Trade tensions with Canada also featured prominently during the week. On September 8, Trump issued measures modifying additional duties on certain Canadian products and separately ordered specified Canadian products to be excluded from U.S. imports. The measures included actions concerning the automotive and dairy sectors and were framed by the administration as responses to what it described as discriminatory Canadian trade practices.

The White House also highlighted new measures aimed at accelerating veterans’ access to benefits and employment opportunities. The administration said it was working to reduce bureaucratic delays and connect veterans with employment opportunities associated with the manufacturing and infrastructure sectors.

On September 9, the White House released a broad review of what it described as the Trump administration’s achievements during its first two years of the current term. The document cited figures involving jobs, investment, immigration, energy and prescription-drug prices. Because these figures are administration claims, they should be evaluated separately against independent government and economic data.

First Lady Melania Trump also unveiled a proposal focused on the preservation and design of historic American spaces. The White House described the initiative as an effort to promote architectural and aesthetic standards in prominent national buildings and sites.

Meanwhile, Japanese beer company Sapporo announced plans to move some production from Canada to the United States, while defense contractor L3Harris received a contract related to the PAC-3 Missile Segment Enhancement program. The White House presented both developments as examples of increased U.S. manufacturing and defense production.

The announcements come as the Trump administration continues to emphasize trade, domestic manufacturing, immigration, energy policy and economic issues ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.

Shibbir Ahmed, WASHINGTON DC — President Donald Trump has signed a short-term government funding bill designed to keep the U.S. federal government operating through December 11, averting the threat of another government shutdown just weeks before the November midterm elections.

Trump signed the legislation Wednesday, September 2, after the U.S. House of Representatives approved the measure by an overwhelming bipartisan vote of 370–48. The Senate had already approved the legislation in August.

The measure, known as a continuing resolution, extends federal funding beyond the beginning of the new fiscal year on October 1. It largely maintains existing funding levels while giving Congress additional time to negotiate and approve the full set of spending bills needed to finance the federal government through fiscal year 2027.

Shutdown threat pushed beyond midterm elections

Without congressional action, federal funding was scheduled to expire at the end of September. That would have raised the possibility of a government shutdown during the final weeks of the midterm-election campaign. Instead, lawmakers have moved the deadline to December 11.

The timing is politically significant. Americans will vote in the November 3 midterm elections, and both Republicans and Democrats had strong incentives to prevent another prolonged disruption of federal services during the campaign season. The legislation gives Congress roughly two additional months to negotiate a longer-term agreement.

However, the agreement does not resolve the underlying budget dispute. Congress still has to complete the regular appropriations process covering major areas of federal spending, including defense, housing, energy and homeland security.

Bipartisan House vote

The House vote demonstrated unusually broad support for the temporary measure. The bill passed 370–48, reflecting support from members of both parties. Its passage followed the Senate’s earlier approval in August, allowing the legislation to reach Trump’s desk before the September 30 funding deadline. The overwhelming vote also underscored the political desire in Washington to avoid another shutdown. The United States experienced major funding disruptions during Trump’s second presidency, making another shutdown particularly politically risky as voters prepare to go to the polls.

What happens next?

The immediate crisis has been postponed, but the budget battle is far from over. Congress must now return to the more difficult task of reaching agreement on full-year appropriations for fiscal year 2027. The December 11 deadline will give lawmakers another opportunity to negotiate, but it also creates a new potential funding showdown later this year.

The outcome of the November elections could significantly influence those negotiations. If control of either chamber changes, the political balance surrounding federal spending, taxation, immigration, defense and domestic programs could shift substantially. For now, however, federal agencies have greater certainty that funding will continue beyond October 1.

A temporary solution, not a permanent budget

The legislation should therefore be viewed as a temporary political compromise rather than a final budget agreement. A continuing resolution allows the government to operate while Congress works toward completing its annual appropriations bills. It prevents the immediate disruption associated with a funding lapse but leaves many of the major disagreements unresolved.

The temporary agreement also means that the next major budget confrontation is likely to occur after the midterm elections, when lawmakers return to Washington with a new political landscape.

For federal employees, contractors and millions of Americans who depend on government services, the immediate message is straightforward: there will be no federal government shutdown at the beginning of October because of the current funding deadline.

But Washington’s budget battle has only been delayed. The next deadline — December 11, 2026 — could once again put Congress and the White House under pressure to reach a deal. With the midterm elections approaching and major disagreements over federal spending still unresolved, the temporary peace in Washington may prove to be just that — temporary.

Shibbir Ahmed, Washington, D.C.: Nearly two dozen Democratic-led states have filed a new lawsuit challenging President Donald Trump’s executive order seeking to restrict mail-in voting. The lawsuit was filed against the U.S. Postal Service (USPS).

The legal action seeks to block the Trump administration’s new rules governing mail-in ballots before the midterm elections scheduled for November. Under the new rules, envelopes containing mail-in ballots must meet specific design and barcode standards, while states would also be required to provide USPS with lists of eligible voters.

The states argue that the new USPS rules interfere with their constitutional authority over elections. They also warn that implementing changes so close to the midterm elections could create significant administrative and logistical challenges for voters and election officials.

In an earlier case involving the same issue, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Trump administration. However, the court did not make a final determination on whether Trump’s order itself was lawful. Instead, it lifted a lower-court injunction after finding that the earlier lawsuit had been filed prematurely.

The new lawsuit involves 23 states, the District of Columbia, and the governor of Pennsylvania. The case was filed in a federal court in Massachusetts. The Trump administration, meanwhile, says the new rules are intended to strengthen the security of mail-in voting. The states, however, are concerned that the new requirements could disrupt the mail-voting process during the November elections.

The key issue: With the 2026 midterm elections approaching, a new legal battle has emerged between the Trump administration and Democratic-led states over control of mail-in voting. The dispute could eventually return to the Supreme Court.

Shibbir Ahmed, Washington, D.C.: The administration of U.S. President Donald Trump has formally submitted a civil nuclear cooperation agreement with Saudi Arabia to Congress for review. However, the Trump administration remains firm that Saudi Arabia must normalize relations with Israel and join the Abraham Accords as part of the broader agreement.

Under the U.S. Atomic Energy Act, the agreement is now subject to congressional review. Congress has 90 days to review and potentially reject the agreement. If Congress does not pass a joint resolution of disapproval during that period, the agreement could take effect.

Last month, U.S. and Saudi energy officials signed the agreement in Washington. Under the deal, U.S. companies would be able to participate in the development of Saudi Arabia’s civilian nuclear program. The proposed agreement could remain in effect for 30 years.

However, the Trump administration’s condition regarding Israel has created new uncertainty over the future of the agreement. Saudi Arabia has long maintained that it would want to see credible progress toward the establishment of a Palestinian state before normalizing diplomatic relations with Israel. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, meanwhile, has opposed the establishment of a Palestinian state.

The agreement has also raised concerns among some members of Congress and nuclear nonproliferation experts. In particular, there are concerns that allowing Saudi Arabia to pursue uranium enrichment in the future could increase the risk of a nuclear arms race in the Middle East.

The key issue: The Trump administration wants to advance long-term civilian nuclear cooperation with Saudi Arabia while linking the agreement to its broader diplomatic goal of normalizing Saudi-Israeli relations. The agreement’s next steps will therefore depend on both Congressional review in Washington and Riyadh’s position on normalization with Israel.