Shibbir Ahmed, United Nations Headquarters, New York: The United States has proposed expanding the arms embargo to cover the entire territory of Sudan as part of efforts to increase pressure on the parties involved in the country’s ongoing civil war. In a draft resolution presented to the United Nations Security Council on Monday, Washington called for extending the existing arms restrictions beyond Darfur to the whole of Sudan, including measures aimed at stopping the transfer of drones and other weapons and military equipment.

The U.S. initiative is intended to prevent foreign military assistance from reaching the parties involved in the Sudan conflict and to pressure them to return to the negotiating table. U.S. officials have argued that military, financial and political support from outside countries has contributed to prolonging the war.

The proposal, however, has exposed divisions within the Security Council. China and Russia, both permanent members of the council, have raised objections to the U.S. initiative. As permanent members, both countries have veto power. Britain and France, meanwhile, have supported the U.S. proposal. Denmark, which holds the Security Council presidency this August, has also backed the initiative.

Sudan has been engulfed in a devastating conflict between the Sudanese Armed Forces and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) since April 2023. According to the United Nations, the fighting has displaced millions of people and created a severe humanitarian crisis across large parts of the country. The protection of civilians and the need to end the conflict were also key issues raised during Monday’s Security Council meeting.

UN political and peacebuilding chief Rosemary DiCarlo warned the Security Council that the conflict in Sudan is worsening and that the warring parties continue to rely on military solutions. She called for stronger international action to help bring an end to the fighting.

If adopted, the U.S. proposal would pave the way for an international arms embargo covering the entire territory of Sudan, including restrictions on the supply of weapons, ammunition and military equipment. Preventing the transfer of modern military technologies, including drones, is also a key objective of the initiative.

However, opposition from China and Russia has created uncertainty over whether the proposal can secure enough support in the Security Council. The U.S. initiative has therefore emerged as a major point of diplomatic tension at the United Nations as international efforts continue to end Sudan’s devastating war.

Shibbir Ahmed, Washington DC: The United States’ national debt has surpassed the $40 trillion mark for the first time, reaching approximately $40.047 trillion on Wednesday, according to the latest data from the U.S. Treasury Department. The historic milestone underscores the scale of the U.S. government’s accumulated debt and is renewing concerns over the country’s long-term fiscal stability.

According to Treasury data, about $32.266 trillion of the total debt is debt held by the public, while approximately $7.782 trillion consists of intragovernmental holdings—amounts owed by one government account or agency to another.

Debt More Than Doubles in Less Than a Decade

The U.S. national debt has increased at an extraordinary pace over the past decade. When Donald Trump first took office as president in 2017, the national debt stood at approximately $19.95 trillion. It has now more than doubled, surpassing $40 trillion.

Economists say no single administration is responsible for the rapid increase. Massive government spending during the COVID-19 pandemic, persistent federal budget deficits, tax cuts and rising spending on major entitlement programs have all contributed to the growth of the national debt. The debt increased substantially during both the Trump and Joe Biden administrations.

Rising Interest Costs Add to Fiscal Pressure

Beyond the size of the debt itself, the cost of servicing it has become a major concern for the U.S. government. According to Reuters analysis, interest payments on the federal debt have become one of the largest components of federal spending and have surpassed spending on Medicare, ranking behind Social Security among the government’s largest expenditures.

Economists warn that interest costs could rise further as older debt is refinanced at higher interest rates. This could limit the government’s ability to allocate resources to areas such as education, infrastructure, defense and other public programs.

Large July Budget Deficit

The latest milestone comes amid continuing large federal budget deficits. According to Reuters, the U.S. government recorded a budget deficit of approximately $432 billion in July alone, one of the largest monthly deficits in the country’s history.

Rising spending on Social Security and Medicare, along with lower-than-expected revenue from tariffs and other sources, contributed to the large shortfall.

Trump Policies Could Add Further to Debt

Concerns are also growing over the potential impact of the Trump administration’s recent tax and spending policies. According to Reuters, President Trump’s widely discussed “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” could add approximately $4.7 trillion to the national debt over the coming years, based on estimates cited in the report.

Economists and budget watchdogs warn that continued growth in federal debt could reduce the government’s fiscal flexibility. It could also make it more difficult for Washington to respond to future economic downturns, inflationary pressures or other national emergencies.

Investor Concerns Grow

The growing national debt is also putting pressure on the U.S. government bond market. Yields on long-term Treasury securities have recently reached multi-year highs as investors demand higher returns to hold long-term U.S. government debt.

On Wednesday, the Treasury Department announced plans to increase its long-term Treasury bond buyback operations. The size of individual operations is expected to increase from about $2 billion to at least $4 billion.

Following the announcement, yields on long-term U.S. government bonds declined somewhat, while global bond markets also reacted positively.

Global Economic Implications

U.S. Treasury securities are widely regarded as among the safest and most important financial assets in the world. As a result, major changes in the U.S. debt and Treasury markets can have consequences far beyond American financial markets.

High government debt, inflation concerns and geopolitical tensions have recently contributed to higher long-term government bond yields in several countries.

Reuters reported that following the latest Treasury action, long-term European bond yields also declined somewhat. At the same time, the U.S. dollar came under pressure while gold prices rose sharply.

A Major Fiscal Challenge Ahead

The crossing of the $40 trillion threshold is more than a statistical milestone for the United States. It reflects decades of federal budget deficits and growing reliance on government borrowing.

Budget analysts warn that if the current pace of debt accumulation continues, Washington could face increasingly limited fiscal flexibility. Borrowing could also become more expensive, particularly during periods of economic stress.

The ultimate impact of the $40 trillion debt level will depend on several factors, including economic growth, interest rates, government spending, tax revenues and the fiscal policies adopted by future administrations.

But the historic milestone has already renewed international debate over the sustainability of U.S. government finances and the future management of the world’s largest sovereign debt.

Shibbir Ahmed, New York: U.S. President Donald Trump has posted a map on social media labeling the strategically important Strait of Hormuz as “New U.S. Territory,” escalating an already tense confrontation with Iran over the vital shipping route.

Trump shared the map on his Truth Social account on Tuesday, August 18, without providing additional explanation. The post came days after he said he intended to declare the Strait of Hormuz a U.S. territory.

The move immediately drew a sharp response from Tehran. Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi dismissed Trump’s claim as a “delusion” and warned that it would either be corrected or challenged by Iran.

The dispute comes as the United States and Iran remain locked in a confrontation over the future of the waterway, which is one of the world’s most important energy and shipping corridors.

Trump Doubles Down on Hormuz Claim

Trump had first suggested last week that the United States could take control of the Strait of Hormuz. On Monday, he told reporters at the White House that making the waterway part of the United States was, in his words, a “great idea.”

His latest social media post went a step further by displaying a map with the strait marked as “New U.S. Territory.”

The Strait of Hormuz lies between Iran and Oman and connects the Persian Gulf with the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea. It is a critical passage for global energy shipments.

Trump’s move has raised questions about the legal and diplomatic implications of any attempt by Washington to claim sovereignty over the waterway.

International law recognizes territorial waters in the Strait as belonging to the coastal states, principally Iran and Oman. A U.S. declaration alone would not establish American sovereignty over the waterway.

Iran Rejects Trump’s Claim

Iran has strongly rejected Trump’s statements about the strait. Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi responded directly to Trump’s map, calling the U.S. president’s claim a “delusion.”

He said the claim would either be corrected or that Iran would take steps to correct what he described as Trump’s mistaken view. Iranian officials have repeatedly insisted that the Strait of Hormuz remains under the control and sovereignty of the countries bordering it.

Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf said Tuesday that the strait would remain closed until the United States accepts Tehran’s demands. Those demands include lifting the U.S. blockade, releasing frozen Iranian assets, ending the oil embargo and stopping military operations against Iran.

Trump Says No Talks Are Underway

Trump’s territorial claim came at the same time as he said there were no negotiations currently taking place with Iran. In a Truth Social post Tuesday, Trump said there were “no talks or conversations” underway or scheduled with Tehran and declared that the U.S. naval blockade remained in force.

The statement appeared to contradict reports from the previous day suggesting that back-channel contacts between U.S. and Iranian officials had taken place. The breakdown in diplomacy comes after a 60-day negotiating period failed to produce a comprehensive agreement between Washington and Tehran.

A Strategic Global Waterway

The Strait of Hormuz is one of the most strategically important waterways in the world. Approximately one-fifth of global oil shipments pass through the strait, making any prolonged disruption a major threat to international energy markets and global economic stability.

Shipping through the waterway has already fallen sharply because of the conflict and security concerns. Major shipping companies have avoided the route, while insurers and energy traders face growing uncertainty over whether commercial vessels can safely transit the area.

A vessel was also reportedly struck by an unknown projectile while transiting the Strait of Hormuz on Tuesday, according to an alert from the United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations center. The incident caused damage to the vessel’s engine room and resulted in a crew casualty.

Iran Strikes Back With California Map

Iran responded to Trump’s provocative map with a provocative image of its own. An official Iranian social media account associated with Iran’s consulate in Hyderabad posted a map of the United States highlighting California and labeling it “NEW TERRITORY OF ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN.”

The post appeared to be a direct satirical response to Trump’s depiction of the Strait of Hormuz as U.S. territory. California is also home to a large Iranian-American community. The exchange of maps underscores the increasingly confrontational rhetoric between Washington and Tehran.

What Would a U.S. Territorial Claim Mean?

Trump’s post does not itself change the legal status of the Strait of Hormuz. The waterway passes through territorial waters associated with Iran and Oman, and its international navigation regime is governed by international maritime law.

Any attempt by the United States to formally claim sovereignty over the strait would therefore have major legal and diplomatic consequences and could trigger opposition from Iran, Oman and other regional states. The dispute also risks complicating efforts to keep one of the world’s most important shipping routes open to international commerce.

Regional Tensions Continue to Rise

The confrontation is also placing pressure on U.S. relations with other Gulf countries. The United Arab Emirates announced Wednesday that it had suspended financial and economic transactions with Iran following what it said were Iranian missile launches toward maritime areas. Iran denied the allegation.

Iranian military officials have separately warned Gulf states against assisting U.S. military operations. The developments indicate that the dispute over Hormuz is increasingly affecting countries beyond the United States and Iran.

Global Energy Security at Risk

The latest escalation has significant implications for the global economy. If shipping through the Strait of Hormuz remains severely restricted, oil and gas supplies from the Persian Gulf could be disrupted, putting upward pressure on energy prices.

Higher energy prices could increase inflation, raise transportation and manufacturing costs and put additional pressure on economies across Asia, Europe and other energy-importing regions. For China, India, Japan, South Korea and European economies that rely heavily on Gulf energy supplies, prolonged disruption could have particularly serious consequences.

A New Flashpoint in the U.S.-Iran Conflict

Trump’s “New U.S. Territory” map represents another escalation in the increasingly bitter confrontation between Washington and Tehran. While the post does not establish any change in sovereignty, it has added a new territorial dimension to an already dangerous dispute over the future of the Strait of Hormuz.

Iran has rejected the claim, while commercial shipping remains severely disrupted and diplomatic efforts remain stalled. The coming days could determine whether the dispute remains primarily a war of rhetoric or develops into a broader confrontation over control of one of the world’s most important strategic waterways.

For the international community, the stakes are enormous. The Strait of Hormuz is not only a regional waterway—it is a critical artery for global energy supplies, international trade and economic stability.

Shibbir Ahmed, New York: The United States has imposed sanctions on International Criminal Court (ICC) President Tomoko Akane and senior trial lawyer Abdoulaye Sey. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced the sanctions on Tuesday, August 18. On Wednesday, August 19, Japan, the ICC and the Netherlands expressed opposition to the move.

The Trump administration accused Akane and Sey of being directly involved in efforts to investigate, arrest, detain or prosecute government officials and nationals of countries that have not accepted the ICC’s jurisdiction. The dispute between Washington and the court has intensified particularly over the ICC’s arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant.

Akane and Sey Added to U.S. Sanctions List

Tomoko Akane, a Japanese national, has served as president of the ICC since 2024. She is the court’s sixth president and the first Japanese national to hold the position. Abdoulaye Sey, a Senegalese national, is a senior trial lawyer at the ICC. He was part of the prosecution team involved in seeking an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Sey has also been nominated for election as an ICC judge.

According to the U.S. Treasury Department’s sanctions list, Akane and Sey have been designated as Specially Designated Nationals (SDNs). As a result, any property or property interests they hold within U.S. jurisdiction will be blocked, and U.S. citizens and companies will generally be prohibited from conducting transactions with them. The U.S. Treasury Department also issued a general license on August 18, allowing certain transactions involving Akane and Sey to be wound down until September 17.

Why Did the U.S. Impose the Sanctions?

Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Akane and Sey were directly involved in ICC efforts to investigate, arrest, detain or prosecute officials from countries whose governments have not accepted the court’s jurisdiction. Rubio has accused the ICC of exceeding the limits of its authority and said its actions pose a threat to U.S. sovereignty. The Trump administration has repeatedly argued that the ICC has sought to expand its jurisdiction by taking legal action against officials from the United States and its close ally, Israel.

Neither the United States nor Israel is a member of the ICC. Under the Rome Statute, however, the court can exercise jurisdiction over certain international crimes committed on the territory of a member state, including in circumstances involving nationals of non-member countries.

ICC Arrest Warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant

The ICC issued arrest warrants in November 2024 for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and then-Defense Minister Yoav Gallant in connection with alleged war crimes related to the Gaza conflict. The decision further intensified tensions between Washington and the ICC. The Trump administration has since imposed several rounds of sanctions against officials associated with the court.

Former ICC Prosecutor Karim Khan, along with several judges and other court officials, had previously been placed under U.S. sanctions. The addition of Akane and Sey further expands the list of ICC officials targeted by Washington.

ICC Condemns U.S. Action

Following the latest sanctions, the ICC strongly condemned the U.S. decision on Wednesday. The court described the move as a serious attack on judicial independence and a threat to the international rule-of-law system. The ICC said that when judicial officials face threats and pressure for carrying out their legal responsibilities, it puts not only the independence of the court but the broader international justice system at risk.

The court also warned that such coercive measures could undermine the ability of victims of war crimes and other serious international crimes to seek justice.

Japan Voices Rare Criticism

Japan has criticized the United States over the sanctions imposed on its citizen and ICC President Tomoko Akane. On Wednesday, Japan’s Foreign Ministry described the U.S. decision as “very unfortunate.” Tokyo said it has long supported the ICC’s efforts to ensure accountability for the most serious crimes of concern to the international community.

Japan also reaffirmed its commitment to strengthening the rule of law within the international community and said it would continue discussions with relevant countries on the issue. The public criticism from Japan, a close U.S. ally, is considered significant amid growing international debate over the future of the ICC.

Netherlands Supports the ICC

The ICC is headquartered in The Hague, Netherlands. Dutch Foreign Minister Tom Berendsen has also opposed the U.S. sanctions. He said international courts and tribunals must be allowed to carry out their responsibilities independently. Berendsen also invited ICC President Tomoko Akane for discussions and reaffirmed the Netherlands’ continued support for the court.

Trump Administration’s Campaign Against the ICC

The Trump administration’s current campaign against the ICC began on February 6, 2025, when President Donald Trump signed an executive order titled “Imposing Sanctions on the International Criminal Court.”

The executive order subsequently became the basis for sanctions against several ICC officials. The addition of Akane and Sey represents another escalation in Washington’s pressure campaign against the court.

In July, Rubio took an even tougher position, saying the Trump administration would intensify its campaign against the ICC. Washington has also encouraged other countries to reconsider their membership in the court.

Growing International Divide Over the ICC

The latest U.S. sanctions have further exposed divisions among Western allies over the ICC and its role in international justice. Japan and the Netherlands have defended the court’s independence, while several European countries have also expressed support for the ICC and the principle of judicial independence.

At the same time, political pressure surrounding the ICC has increased among its member states, with some countries recently discussing or considering whether to withdraw from the court.

The legality of U.S. sanctions against ICC officials is also being challenged in U.S. courts. In June, three ICC judges filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, while human rights organizations have filed separate legal challenges. The new sanctions against Tomoko Akane and Abdoulaye Sey mark another escalation in the ongoing confrontation between the Trump administration and the ICC.

Washington argues that the court’s actions threaten U.S. sovereignty and the security of its allies. The ICC, meanwhile, maintains that pressure and sanctions against judicial officials threaten the independence of international justice and the rule of law.

Shibbir Ahmed, New York: U.S. President Donald Trump has ruled out any immediate negotiations with Iran, as the standoff over the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz deepens and uncertainty over global energy supplies continues to grow.

Trump said Tuesday, August 18, that no talks were currently taking place with Tehran and that none were scheduled. His comments came as Iran insisted that the Strait of Hormuz remains closed to shipping and said the waterway would stay shut until the United States meets its demands.

The conflicting claims have added to uncertainty surrounding one of the world’s most important energy corridors. The Strait of Hormuz carries roughly one-fifth of global crude oil and liquefied natural gas shipments, making prolonged disruption a major concern for energy markets and the global economy.

No Talks With Tehran

Trump’s statement marked a sharp departure from earlier suggestions that diplomatic contacts might resume. Iran has indicated that it is willing to discuss the conflict, but Tehran has demanded significant concessions, including an end to the U.S. blockade, the release of frozen Iranian assets and other measures before normal shipping through the strait can resume.

Trump, however, has rejected the idea that Washington is currently negotiating with Tehran and has continued to maintain pressure on Iran.

The breakdown follows the expiration of a 60-day U.S.-Iran memorandum that had been intended to provide time for negotiations toward a broader agreement. The arrangement expired without a lasting peace deal, leaving the two sides further apart.

Hormuz Traffic Falls Sharply

Despite Trump’s assertion that the Strait of Hormuz is open, commercial shipping through the waterway remains severely restricted.

According to Kpler data cited by Reuters, only six commodity vessels passed through the strait on Tuesday, down from nine the previous day and below the recent average of about 11 daily transits. Major shipowners continue to avoid the waterway because of security concerns.

The decline in shipping has raised concerns about the continued flow of oil and gas from the Persian Gulf.

China, one of the world’s largest buyers of Middle Eastern energy, is particularly exposed to the disruption. Two major Chinese shipping companies that previously transported a substantial share of China’s Middle Eastern oil imports have stopped operating through the Strait of Hormuz and Bab al-Mandeb.

Oil Prices Under Pressure

The uncertainty has already affected global energy markets. Brent crude was trading around $91.20 a barrel on Wednesday, August 19, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude was around $85.10 a barrel. Both benchmarks had reached their highest levels since late July before retreating slightly.

Analysts say the continuing risk surrounding Hormuz is keeping a geopolitical premium in oil prices. If the disruption persists or the conflict escalates, crude prices could move substantially higher again.

The implications extend beyond gasoline and transportation costs. Higher energy prices can increase inflationary pressure, raise production and shipping costs, and complicate economic policy for governments around the world.

Iran Says Strait Will Remain Closed

Iran has maintained that the Strait of Hormuz will remain closed until Washington meets conditions Tehran considers necessary for reopening the waterway. The Iranian position directly contradicts Trump’s assertion that the strait remains open and safe.

The standoff has effectively created two competing realities: Washington says commercial shipping can use the waterway, while Tehran maintains that normal passage will not resume until its demands are addressed. That uncertainty itself has become a major problem for shipping companies, insurers and energy traders.

Regional Tensions Escalate

The crisis is no longer limited to the United States and Iran. The United Arab Emirates announced Wednesday that it had suspended financial and economic transactions with Iran following what it said were Iranian missile launches toward maritime areas. Iran denied the UAE’s allegations.

The UAE’s decision represents another significant escalation because the country has historically been an important commercial and financial channel for Iran despite extensive U.S. sanctions.

The crisis has also affected shipping beyond the Gulf, with security concerns extending to the Red Sea and the Bab al-Mandeb waterway.

Washington and Tehran Remain Far Apart

The collapse of the latest diplomatic effort leaves little indication of an immediate breakthrough. Iran wants sanctions relief, an end to the U.S. blockade, the release of frozen assets and compensation related to the conflict. Trump has rejected Iran’s demands and has continued to apply economic and military pressure.

Both sides have also accused the other of blocking the path to peace. The result is a dangerous stalemate: the United States says it wants Iran to accept an agreement on its nuclear program and broader security concerns, while Tehran insists that Washington must first change its own military and economic policies.

Global Economic Consequences

The Strait of Hormuz crisis is being closely watched far beyond the Middle East. A prolonged disruption could affect energy-importing economies across Asia and Europe, particularly countries heavily dependent on Gulf oil and gas.

Higher crude prices could also increase inflation at a time when central banks are attempting to balance economic growth with price stability. Reuters reported that financial markets have already been reacting to the broader U.S.-Iran confrontation, with concerns over energy disruptions contributing to higher borrowing costs and renewed inflation fears.

A Critical Test for Diplomacy

For now, the immediate question is whether Washington and Tehran can return to negotiations before the Hormuz crisis becomes a longer-term disruption to global trade. Trump has ruled out current or scheduled talks, while Iran continues to link the reopening of the waterway to political and economic concessions.

Meanwhile, commercial vessels are avoiding the strait, oil prices remain elevated and regional tensions continue to spread. The longer the standoff lasts, the greater the risk that the Strait of Hormuz becomes not only a flashpoint in the U.S.-Iran conflict but also a major source of instability for the global economy.

For the international community, the stakes extend well beyond the Middle East: the future of one of the world’s most important shipping routes—and the stability of global energy markets—may depend on whether diplomacy can be restored.

Shibbir Ahmed, United Nations, New York: At least 300 children have been killed in the besieged Gaza Strip over the 300 days since a so-called ceasefire agreement went into effect, according to the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), which stated that the truce has proven to be a complete failure for the children of Gaza. The ceasefire agreement was signed in October of last year with the aim of halting military operations between Hamas and Israeli forces, but violence has continued despite the deal.

Edouard Beigbeder, UNICEF’s regional director for the Middle East and North Africa, expressed outrage, stating that a ceasefire in which an average of one child dies every day is a total failure to protect children. He added that hundreds of children are spending their days in hospital beds with severe injuries, and that the children of Gaza are still waiting for the peace they were promised.

Despite the agreement, the procession of children’s deaths in Gaza has not stopped. Premature and sick babies are being born to hunger-stricken mothers. A severe humanitarian crisis has been created due to a lack of adequate medical supplies and relief, and an entire generation in Gaza is being deprived of basic amenities and education. With renewed Israeli airstrikes and military operations, Gaza’s families have been forced to seek shelter in only one-third of the territory, living subhuman lives amidst rubble and piles of garbage.

UNICEF spokesperson Louise Wateridge stated that due to a lack of adequate incubators, two or three newborns are often placed in a single machine. Newborns just days old, born in partially functioning hospitals lacking sufficient medicine and equipment, are fighting desperately to survive. She said the international community has accepted this situation, but this carnage must be stopped, adequate relief must be allowed to enter, and children must be protected. While the world calls it a ceasefire, families in Gaza are still burying their children, as a ceasefire does not mean children should die every day.

According to data from the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), a total of 1,209 people have been killed and 3,943 injured in Gaza since the ceasefire was declared on October 10 of last year. Additionally, a recent attack on a medical warehouse near Al-Aqsa Hospital in Deir al-Balah destroyed emergency medical supplies provided by the World Health Organization (WHO).

Michigan, USA: Progressive politician and physician Dr. Abdul El-Sayed has won the Democratic Senate primary in the important battleground state of Michigan. In a closely contested race, he defeated moderate Democratic candidate Congresswoman Haley Stevens.

El-Sayed’s victory is being viewed as a major achievement for the progressive wing of the Democratic Party. Michigan’s Senate seat is considered one of the most competitive races ahead of the 2026 U.S. Senate elections.

During his campaign, El-Sayed focused on issues including healthcare reform, reducing the cost of living for ordinary Americans, and addressing economic inequality. His campaign attracted strong support from young voters and progressive activists.

Meanwhile, Haley Stevens was backed by established Democratic leaders and moderate voters. The contest between the two candidates highlighted the broader debate over the future direction of the Democratic Party.

El-Sayed will now face Republican candidate Mike Rogers in the general election. Political analysts believe the race could have significant implications for the balance of power in the U.S. Senate, as Michigan remains a key swing state.

Dr. Abdul El-Sayed’s primary victory is being seen as a sign of the growing influence of progressive politics within the Democratic Party, sparking new discussions in national politics ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.

TEHRAN – Iran’s Revolutionary Guards said on Wednesday that their naval forces stopped two ships attempting to cross the Strait of Hormuz and directed them to the territorial waters of the Islamic Republic.

“The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps naval force this morning identified and stopped in the Strait of Hormuz two violating ships,” the Guards said in a statement.

“The two offending ships… were seized by the IRGC’s naval forces and directed to the Iranian coast.”

They identified one ship as “MSC-FRANCESCA”, which they said belonged “to the Zionist regime” in reference to Israel, and the other as “EPAMINONDAS”, which they said was “tampering with navigation systems and jeopardising maritime security.”

The Guards further warned against any action against the regulations imposed by the Islamic republic in the strait “as well as activities contrary to the safe passage” through the waterway.

Tehran has said vessels must seek permission to leave of enter the Gulf through Hormuz, through a route that in peacetime accounts for a fifth of the world’s oil and gas exports along with other vital commodities.

Iran and the United States failed to strike a deal Sunday to end the war in the Middle East, but there was no immediate return to hostilities and the region clung to hope that a fragile truce would hold. US Vice President JD Vance left Pakistan after the talks — the highest-level meeting between the two sides since the 1979 Islamic revolution — and warned that Washington had made Tehran its “final and best offer” for a deal.

“We leave here with a very simple proposal,” he said. “We’ll see if the Iranians accept it.”

Iran’s parliamentary speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf said his negotiating team “put forward constructive initiatives but ultimately the other side was unable to gain the trust of the Iranian delegation in this round of negotiations.”

The failure of the talks will raise concerns that a return to fighting could drive world energy prices higher and further damage shipping and oil and gas facilities in the Gulf. But Saudi Arabia’s energy ministry said Sunday its key east-west oil pipeline was back in service after it was damaged in earlier strikes, and Qatar’s transport ministry said it was lifting some restrictions on Gulf shipping.

Pakistan, which hosted the talks and whose leadership had ushered the rival sides to the table, said it would keep facilitating dialogue and urged both countries to continue respecting the temporary truce.

“It is imperative that the parties continue to uphold their commitment to ceasefire,” Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar said.

US news website Axios quoted an unnamed source briefed on the negotiations as saying that disagreements included “Iran’s demand to control the Strait of Hormuz and refusal to give up on its enriched uranium stockpile.”

UK health minister Wes Streeting, speaking for the British government, told Sky News that the failure of the talks was disappointing but “that doesn’t mean there isn’t merit in continuing to try.”

The United States and Israel attacked Iran on February 28, sparking retaliation from Tehran that has plunged the Middle East into conflict and shaken the global economy. Iran and the US had entered the talks mediated by Pakistan with maximalist positions, with Washington piling pressure by saying it had sent minesweeping ships through the vital Strait of Hormuz maritime route.

Signs of strain in the negotiations appeared when Iranian media accused the United States of making “excessive demands” over the strait, through which one-fifth of the world’s oil transited before its effective closure by Iran during the war. US President Donald Trump had also insisted several hours into the talks on Saturday that the United States had already triumphed on the battlefield by killing Iranian leaders and destroying key military infrastructure.

“Whether we make a deal or not makes no difference to me. The reason is because we’ve won,” Trump said. The high-stakes 21-hour meeting had unfolded in Islamabad with both sides exhibiting intense mistrust. Iran was in the middle of negotiations in February with Trump’s real-estate friend Steve Witkoff and son-in-law Jared Kushner when the US and Israel attacked.

Both Kushner and Witkoff were part of Vance’s team in Pakistan. The first salvos of the war killed Iran’s supreme leader Ali Khamenei. Iranian demands for any agreement to end the war include unfreezing sanctioned Iranian assets and ending Israel’s war against Hezbollah in Lebanon. The opening of the Strait of Hormuz has also presented a friction point. Iran throughout the war exercised global economic leverage by asserting control of the maritime route, sending oil prices soaring and piling political pressure on Trump as US fuel costs rose.

The US military said Saturday that two Navy warships transited through the strait to begin clearing it of mines and ensure it is a “safe pathway” for tankers. The Iranian military denied that any American warships had entered the waterway and threatened to respond if they do so. The Revolutionary Guards’ Naval Command said Iranian promises of safe passage during a two-week ceasefire applied only to “civilian vessels under specific conditions.”

A complicating factor has been Israel’s assertion that the ceasefire does not affect Lebanon, where the Israeli military has launched strikes and a ground invasion in response to rocket fire from Hezbollah, the Iranian-backed movement. Lebanese authorities said Israeli strikes on the country’s south on Saturday killed 18 people, bringing the death toll from Israel’s operations since the war broke out past 2,000.

Israel and Lebanon will hold their own talks next week in Washington. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Saturday that he wanted a peace deal with Lebanon that “will last for generations.”

But Israel has ruled out a ceasefire with Hezbollah, signaling it will instead seek to pressure the historically weak central government in Beirut.

MOSCOW – Russian President Vladimir Putin on Thursday called for intensifying political and diplomatic efforts to end the Middle East war during a phone call with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.

“Both sides emphasised the need for a rapid cessation of hostilities and the intensification of political and diplomatic efforts to achieve a long-term settlement of the conflict,” the Kremlin said in a read-out of the call. The call comes after Ukraine signed an air defence deal with Saudi Arabia as the Gulf nation grapples with Iranian drone attacks.