SANAA, Yemen — Tensions in the Middle East intensified Tuesday after reports of Saudi-led coalition airstrikes targeting oil facilities west of Yemen’s capital, Sanaa, as Yemen’s Iran-backed Houthi rebels threatened retaliation against Saudi Arabia. Houthi-affiliated broadcaster Al-Masirah reported that airstrikes had hit oil facilities in the area.

The reports followed a warning from the Saudi-led coalition urging civilians to evacuate the Yemen Oil Company’s Sabah central station and nearby areas ahead of a planned military operation. Witnesses in Sanaa reported hearing explosions, but the full extent of the damage and any casualties had not been immediately confirmed, according to the Associated Press.

Houthi military spokesperson Yahya Saree warned that any Saudi attack on Sanaa would prompt a forceful response against the Saudi capital, Riyadh. The Houthis also warned employees and civilians near Saudi Aramco oil facilities to evacuate, declaring the facilities potential targets for their forces. The exchange of threats raises concerns about further attacks on critical infrastructure, including oil facilities, airports and other strategic sites across the region.

The latest developments come amid an intensifying military confrontation involving Saudi Arabia, Yemen’s internationally recognized government and the Houthi movement. Saudi Arabia has renewed military operations against the Houthis while backing a government-led counteroffensive following the group’s seizure of strategic territory along Yemen’s Red Sea coast.

The conflict has also expanded against the backdrop of wider tensions involving the United States and Iran. Recent Houthi attacks on Saudi infrastructure have disrupted air travel and heightened security concerns across the Gulf.

The Bab el-Mandeb Strait, which connects the Red Sea to the Gulf of Aden, remains a critical passage for international shipping and energy transportation. Further escalation around the waterway could threaten commercial shipping, increase transportation costs and add pressure to global energy markets.

The escalating confrontation raises fresh concerns about civilian safety, regional stability and the risk of a broader conflict. Military operations near oil facilities and other critical infrastructure could have consequences beyond Yemen and Saudi Arabia, particularly if attacks spread to major transport routes or energy installations.

Diplomatic efforts to prevent further escalation remain important as regional governments confront growing security risks and the potential economic consequences of prolonged hostilities. The situation remains fluid, and further confirmation is needed regarding the reported airstrikes, damage and possible casualties.

Shibbir Ahmed, New York — The number of people living in acute multidimensional poverty has risen to 1.2 billion for the first time since the global index was launched in 2010, according to a new United Nations report, highlighting the continuing struggle of millions of families to access basic necessities. The findings were published on October 12 in the 2026 Global Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI), prepared by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and the Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative (OPHI) at the University of Oxford.

The report estimates that 1.2 billion people across 108 developing countries are experiencing overlapping deprivations in health, education and living standards. This represents 18.9 percent of the 6.3 billion people covered by the study. The number is 51.5 million higher than in the previous update on a comparable basis, marking the first increase recorded since the index was introduced in 2010.

Children account for more than half of those living in multidimensional poverty. The report estimates that approximately 617 million children are affected, while 83 percent of all people experiencing multidimensional poverty live in rural areas. The findings underscore how poverty extends beyond household income. Families may face several disadvantages simultaneously, including inadequate nutrition, limited access to education, unsafe drinking water, poor sanitation and a lack of electricity.

UNDP Administrator Alexander De Croo described the increase as a wake-up call for the international community, stressing that millions of people continue to endure hardships that reinforce one another. The report also highlights the importance of coordinated policies that address health, education and living conditions together rather than treating poverty as an income problem alone.

Despite the overall increase, the report points to examples of meaningful progress. Among 89 countries with data suitable for measuring trends, 33 reduced their multidimensional poverty index values by at least half in fewer than 15 years. The latest update also found mixed results among the 13 countries with newly updated estimates. Some countries recorded significant improvements, demonstrating that sustained policy efforts can reduce deprivation even in challenging circumstances.

The index uses household survey data to measure disadvantages across health, education and living standards. A person is classified as multidimensionally poor when their household experiences deprivation in at least one-third of the index’s weighted indicators. The findings reinforce the urgency of achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal of substantially reducing poverty in all its forms by 2030. The report calls attention to the need for targeted investment, stronger public services and coordinated action to ensure that vulnerable communities are not left behind.

Shibbir Ahmed, New York –  International human rights organization Human Rights Watch (HRW) has raised concerns over the mass detention of opposition political activists in Bangladesh, warning of growing threats to political freedoms and human rights. In a report published on October 5, HRW said police detained approximately 290 people attending a meeting of the Jatiya Samajtantrik Dal (JSD), a left-wing political party, in Dhaka on September 26.

According to the report written by Elaine Pearson, HRW’s Asia director, members of the ruling Bangladesh Nationalist Party’s (BNP) youth wing, Jubo Dal, alleged that the gathering was a secret meeting of the banned Awami League. The report said a court remanded 27 of those detained to custody over allegations that they had chanted “Joy Bangla,” a slogan associated with the Awami League.

The JSD was part of the 14-party alliance led by the Awami League, which governed Bangladesh from 2009 until 2024. The Sheikh Hasina government fell following student-led protests in 2024, during which hundreds of people were killed by security forces, according to the HRW report.

HRW also reported that police detained 12 Awami League activists in Barisal on September 26 over allegations that they had held a secret meeting to plan sabotage. Two days later, another 15 people were arrested in Dhaka under Bangladesh’s 2009 Anti-Terrorism Act on similar allegations. According to the report, those detained said they had gathered to mark former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina’s birthday.

The report noted that serious human rights violations occurred during Hasina’s rule, including extrajudicial killings, enforced disappearances, torture and arbitrary detention of political opponents. The BNP also faced severe repression while it was in opposition. However, HRW stressed that past human rights abuses do not justify similar violations by the current government.

The organization expressed concern over the arbitrary detention of perceived Awami League supporters and the rollback of human rights safeguards proposed by the interim government.

International human rights law protects freedom of expression and association. According to HRW, violations committed under a previous government cannot justify restrictions on the same rights under a new administration. The report underscores continuing concerns over the protection of political freedoms, due process and the rule of law in Bangladesh.

DUBAI — Iran is reviewing Washington’s response to its proposal to reopen the strategically important Strait of Hormuz and says it will communicate its position through intermediaries once the review is complete, as stalled negotiations and escalating Middle East tensions continue to threaten global energy security. Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei said Monday that Tehran was still examining the US response and remained in contact with Washington through intermediaries. His remarks indicate that diplomatic channels remain open, although major disagreements over the conditions for reopening the waterway and resuming negotiations have yet to be resolved.

The diplomatic impasse comes as oil prices remain elevated amid attacks on shipping and Saudi infrastructure. The Strait of Hormuz is one of the world’s most important energy transit routes, connecting the Persian Gulf with international markets through the Gulf of Oman.

Iran submitted its proposal in mid-September as part of efforts to end the conflict and restore maritime traffic through the Strait of Hormuz. Baghaei said Tehran would send its response to Washington through intermediaries after completing its review. He did not provide a specific timeline for the decision.

Iran’s security leadership has argued that Washington’s response does not adequately address seven conditions Tehran has outlined for reopening the waterway and returning to negotiations.

A central disagreement concerns the order in which the two sides should address outstanding issues. Washington wants Iran’s nuclear programme included at the beginning of negotiations, while Tehran argues that reopening the strait and restoring maritime security should take priority. The disagreement has complicated diplomatic efforts despite continued exchanges of messages between the two sides.

The Strait of Hormuz is a narrow maritime passage linking the Persian Gulf to the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea. Before the current conflict, approximately one-fifth of global oil and liquefied natural gas trade passed through the waterway.

Its importance extends well beyond the Middle East. Major energy-importing economies in Asia, as well as markets in Europe, depend on uninterrupted shipments of oil and natural gas from Gulf producers. Disruptions to the route can increase shipping costs, delay deliveries and create uncertainty for refiners, energy companies and governments planning fuel supplies.

The continuing confrontation has already affected maritime traffic and energy exports. Even a partial recovery in shipping would depend on vessels being able to transit the strait safely and consistently.

Energy markets have reacted to the latest developments in the Middle East, including attacks on Saudi Arabia and incidents involving commercial shipping. Brent crude futures rose to $106.76 a barrel on October 11, while US West Texas Intermediate crude reached $93.69, according to Reuters. Prices were supported by concerns about the security of Gulf energy infrastructure and maritime routes.

Higher oil prices can increase transportation and manufacturing costs, place pressure on household fuel bills and complicate efforts by central banks to control inflation. However, prices also depend on factors beyond the Strait of Hormuz, including global demand, available inventories, production decisions and developments in other oil-producing regions. The longer maritime uncertainty persists, the more difficult it becomes for energy markets to assess the reliability of supplies from the Gulf.

Qatar and Pakistan are among the countries involved in efforts to facilitate communication between Washington and Tehran. Their diplomatic role reflects wider regional concerns about the economic and security consequences of a prolonged confrontation. A negotiated arrangement could potentially restore maritime traffic while creating a framework for addressing other outstanding disputes.

The negotiations nevertheless face substantial obstacles. The United States and Iran disagree on the sequencing of discussions, the conditions for reopening the waterway and the broader issues that should be included in a settlement. Neither side has publicly confirmed a final agreement to resolve the current impasse.

The Hormuz negotiations are unfolding alongside a separate escalation involving Saudi Arabia and Yemen’s Iran-aligned Houthi movement. Recent attacks on Riyadh have disrupted aviation and heightened concerns about the security of civilian infrastructure. Saudi Arabia has been considering its military response, while Washington has weighed whether to become more directly involved in operations against the Houthis.

The overlapping crises are increasing pressure on regional governments to strengthen defenses and prevent further disruption to international trade. Although the Houthi conflict and the US-Iran negotiations are distinct issues, both affect regional stability and the security of important maritime routes. Iran has reiterated that dialogue should be used to resolve the dispute involving Saudi Arabia and the Houthis, while continuing to review Washington’s response to its Hormuz proposal.

The immediate question is whether Iran will formally respond to the US proposal and whether that response can restart substantive negotiations. A breakthrough could help restore confidence in maritime transport and reduce some of the uncertainty affecting oil markets. Failure to reach an understanding could prolong disruptions and increase pressure on governments, shipping companies and energy producers.

Even if an agreement on reopening the strait emerges, a lasting resolution would depend on implementation, reliable maritime security arrangements and progress on the wider issues dividing Washington and Tehran.

For now, Iran says its review is continuing, and no final agreement has been announced. The outcome of the negotiations could have significant consequences for Middle East security, international shipping and the stability of global energy supplies.

Shibbir Ahmed, Washington DC — US President Donald Trump is weighing whether the United States should join Saudi Arabia in military strikes against Yemen’s Iran-aligned Houthi movement, as a series of missile and drone attacks on Saudi territory intensifies concerns about a wider Middle East conflict.

Trump said on Saturday, October 10, that Washington was evaluating whether to participate in Saudi strikes against the Houthis following attacks on King Khalid International Airport in Riyadh and other Saudi targets. As of Monday, no US decision to launch direct strikes against the group had been confirmed in the reporting available.

The escalating confrontation presents a growing challenge for Washington and Riyadh, which are seeking to counter Houthi military advances near the strategically important Red Sea shipping corridor while protecting Saudi airports, military facilities and energy infrastructure.

Trump’s comments followed renewed Houthi attacks on Saudi Arabia, including a deadly strike targeting Riyadh’s airport complex. Asked whether the United States might join Saudi military operations, Trump said Washington would consider the possibility and make a decision after reviewing the latest developments. The administration’s next steps could have significant implications for the conflict. Direct American strikes would expand Washington’s military role in Yemen at a time when the United States is already involved in a broader confrontation with Iran.

For now, the distinction between considering military intervention and authorizing an attack remains important. No confirmed announcement of new US strikes against the Houthis had emerged in the reporting reviewed for this article.

Saudi Arabia has faced an intensifying campaign of missile and drone attacks attributed to the Houthis, who have claimed responsibility for strikes against Saudi airports and other infrastructure. The attacks have disrupted aviation operations and heightened concerns about the vulnerability of critical civilian facilities. A deadly strike on Riyadh’s King Khalid International Airport has prompted Saudi authorities to investigate how the country’s air-defense systems failed to prevent the attack.

Saudi Arabia has also conducted airstrikes against Houthi positions in Yemen, including reported operations in al-Jawf province. Despite the Saudi-led campaign, the Houthis have continued to threaten Saudi infrastructure. The repeated attacks have increased pressure on the Saudi government to strengthen its defenses and seek additional military support from its international partners.

The conflict is closely linked to the struggle for control and security along Yemen’s Red Sea coastline, particularly near the Bab el-Mandeb Strait. The narrow waterway connects the Red Sea with the Gulf of Aden and serves as an important passage for international shipping, including commercial goods and energy supplies moving between Europe and Asia.

Saudi Arabia has supported Yemeni government-aligned forces seeking to reverse recent Houthi advances near the shipping corridor. The Saudi-led coalition has provided air support as its partners attempt to regain territory. However, military gains have been uneven, and the Houthis continue to pose a threat to shipping and regional infrastructure. A broader confrontation could increase risks for commercial vessels, raise shipping and insurance costs, and place additional pressure on global energy markets.

Saudi Arabia’s renewed involvement in Yemen’s civil war reflects concerns that Houthi advances could strengthen the group’s ability to threaten the kingdom and important regional trade routes. Riyadh must balance the need to protect its territory against the risks of a prolonged military campaign. Continued airstrikes could weaken Houthi capabilities, but they may also provoke additional retaliation against airports, oil facilities and other strategic targets.

The Associated Press has reported that Saudi authorities are examining the failure of air defenses to stop the deadly attack on Riyadh airport. The incident has intensified questions about the kingdom’s ability to defend its infrastructure against coordinated missile and drone attacks. The possibility of expanded American assistance has therefore become an important issue for Saudi security planners.

Amid the escalation, Iran has offered to facilitate dialogue between Saudi Arabia and the Houthis. Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei said on Monday that Tehran remained willing to help facilitate discussions between the parties. The offer presents a potential diplomatic avenue even as the conflict intensifies. Iran has longstanding ties with the Houthi movement, while Saudi Arabia views the group’s military activities as a direct security threat. Whether Tehran can help produce a meaningful reduction in violence remains uncertain. No agreement to halt the attacks was confirmed in the reporting available on Monday.

The United Arab Emirates has called for renewed cooperation among Gulf countries on regional security and defense following the attacks on Saudi Arabia. UAE presidential adviser Anwar Gargash warned that attacks against the kingdom threaten the security of the wider Gulf region.

The appeal reflects concerns that individual countries may struggle to counter increasingly sophisticated missile and drone threats without closer regional coordination. Saudi Arabia and the UAE have previously cooperated in Yemen, although they have also supported different factions within the broader anti-Houthi coalition. If Washington authorizes direct strikes against the Houthis, the decision could reshape the military and diplomatic dynamics of the conflict. Potential consequences include

American involvement could increase pressure on Houthi forces but also trigger retaliation against US or allied interests. Further escalation could endanger vessels operating near the Bab el-Mandeb Strait and surrounding waters. Continued attacks on Saudi facilities could affect confidence in regional energy security. Regional governments may face increased pressure to negotiate a halt to attacks before the conflict expands further.

The actual consequences would depend on the scope of any US operation, the response from the Houthis and Iran, and whether diplomatic channels remain open. The immediate focus is on whether Trump authorizes direct US military action, whether Saudi Arabia can improve its defenses against incoming attacks, and whether Iran’s offer to mediate leads to substantive negotiations.

Saudi Arabia faces continued security threats, while the United States must weigh the potential benefits of military intervention against the possibility of a broader and more difficult conflict.

For now, Washington’s position remains under consideration rather than a confirmed decision to launch strikes. The coming days could prove significant for regional security, the future of Yemen’s conflict and the safety of one of the world’s most important maritime trade corridors.

RIYADH, Saudi Arabia — A series of deadly attacks attributed to Yemen’s Iran-aligned Houthi movement has intensified security concerns across the Middle East, prompting Saudi Arabia to reinforce its response, suspend operations at its main airport in Riyadh, and assess the risk of a wider regional conflict.

Saudi Arabia faced renewed missile and drone threats on Monday, October 12, following attacks on King Khalid International Airport that killed civilians and disrupted air travel. The escalation comes amid the broader conflict involving the United States and Iran, raising concerns about the security of Gulf states, international aviation, and critical energy and shipping routes.

Saudi authorities reported that an attack on Riyadh’s King Khalid International Airport on Sunday killed one person and injured 11 others. The victim was identified as a Pakistani national. The incident followed a deadly strike on Saturday that killed 12 people and injured more than 300, according to reporting by international news organizations. An Indian national subsequently died from injuries sustained in Saturday’s attack, bringing the reported death toll from that incident to 13.

The attacks targeted the airport complex serving domestic passengers, raising serious concerns about civilian safety and the vulnerability of critical transportation infrastructure. The Houthis claimed responsibility for the strikes, according to Reuters and other media reports.

Saudi authorities extended the suspension of operations at Riyadh’s international airport as officials assessed damage and reviewed security arrangements. The disruption has affected airlines operating between Saudi Arabia and destinations in Europe and Asia. Aviation analytics firm Cirium estimated that approximately 60% of scheduled flights across Saudi Arabia could be cancelled on Monday, while cancellations at Riyadh airport were particularly severe.

The US Federal Aviation Administration also advised American airlines to exercise caution when flying to or over Saudi Arabia. Several international carriers suspended or adjusted services, reflecting the growing operational risks associated with the attacks.

The repeated attacks have increased pressure on the Saudi government to strengthen its defenses and respond to the Houthi campaign. Saudi-led coalition forces have reported renewed missile and drone activity, while Saudi forces have intensified strikes against Houthi positions in Yemen. However, the effectiveness of further military action remains uncertain, and continued exchanges could increase the danger to civilians on both sides.

The Associated Press reported that Saudi Arabia has opened an investigation into how its air defenses failed to prevent the deadly airport attack. The incident has raised questions about the ability of existing defense systems to protect major civilian facilities against coordinated drone and missile strikes.

Turkey, Pakistan, Egypt and Saudi Arabia condemned the attacks in a joint statement, describing them as a dangerous escalation and calling for an immediate halt to the strikes. The four countries expressed support for Saudi Arabia’s efforts to counter the threats and prevent further attacks. Their response reflects concern that continued violence could threaten regional stability and international peace and security.

The United Arab Emirates has also called for stronger cooperation among Gulf states on security and defense. UAE presidential adviser Anwar Gargash warned that attacks against Saudi Arabia undermine the security of the wider Gulf region.

Despite Iran’s longstanding support for the Houthi movement, Tehran has offered to help facilitate dialogue between the Houthis and Saudi Arabia. Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei said Monday that Tehran was prepared to assist efforts to bring the parties into talks. Whether this offer can lead to a meaningful reduction in violence remains unclear.

The diplomatic development comes as Saudi Arabia confronts renewed attacks and considers its military options. The situation presents a difficult challenge for regional governments seeking to protect critical infrastructure without triggering a broader confrontation.

The conflict also threatens important international trade routes. The Bab el-Mandeb Strait, near Yemen’s coastline, is a strategic passage linking the Red Sea with the Gulf of Aden and the wider Indian Ocean. Any disruption to shipping through the strait could affect the movement of oil, fuel and other commercial goods. The attacks have also raised concerns about Saudi energy infrastructure, a particularly significant issue for one of the world’s largest oil-producing countries.

A wider conflict involving additional regional or international forces could compound existing pressures on energy markets and maritime commerce. However, the scale of any future disruption will depend on developments on the ground and whether the attacks continue.

US President Donald Trump has said Washington is considering joining Saudi Arabia in strikes against the Houthis. As of Monday’s reporting, there was no confirmed announcement that the United States had begun direct military operations against the group in response to the latest airport attacks. Any American intervention could significantly change the conflict’s trajectory. It could increase military pressure on the Houthis, but it could also prompt further retaliation against Saudi infrastructure or international shipping. The possibility of a wider confrontation involving Saudi Arabia, the Houthis, Iran and the United States remains a major concern for regional security officials.

The attacks on Riyadh’s airport represent a serious escalation because they have caused substantial civilian casualties, disrupted international aviation and increased pressure for a military response. Saudi Arabia now faces the challenge of protecting its population and infrastructure while avoiding a conflict that could spread across the region. Diplomatic efforts, including Iran’s offer to mediate, may provide an avenue for de-escalation, but no agreement to halt the attacks has been confirmed in the reporting cited here. The central question is whether regional governments can contain the confrontation before further strikes or outside military intervention turn it into a broader Middle East war.

Prime Minister Tarique Rahman met a Canadian delegation led by Secretary of State for International Development Randeep Sarai at the Prime Minister’s Office in Dhaka. Photo: PMO
DHAKA – Prime Minister Tarique Rahman today sought Canadian cooperation in education, health, energy and agriculture, alongside food security, technical education and climate financing, to strengthen bilateral ties and expand development cooperation.

He made the call when a delegation led by Canada’s Secretary of State for International Development Randeep Sarai paid a courtesy call on him at the Prime Minister’s Office at the Secretariat here, said PM’s Deputy Press Secretary Shahadat Shadhin. During the meeting, the two sides discussed strengthening bilateral relations, expanding economic cooperation and exploring new avenues for strategic partnership, alongside the Rohingya crisis and other development priorities.

The Prime Minister said Bangladesh looked forward to cooperation from friendly countries like Canada in key sectors, including health and education. On energy, the Canadian side expressed interest in supporting Bangladesh’s energy supply, particularly in oil and liquefied natural gas (LNG).

In health and skills development, Canada expressed interest in expanding cooperation in technical and vocational education and training, including nursing education. The Canadian side also indicated interest in supporting nursing training institutions and developing skilled nurses, building on its existing activities in the sector.

In agriculture, the discussions covered cooperation in pulses and oilseeds, food security and data-driven agricultural planning. The Canadian side also briefed the prime minister on its ongoing activities through the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT).

Tarique Rahman outlined the government’s plan to introduce Farmer Cards to provide farmers with fertilisers, seeds and other essential agricultural inputs, saying, “The initiative would also help build a comprehensive database of farmers, enabling better agricultural planning and more effective delivery of government support.”

On the Rohingya crisis, the Prime Minister said Bangladesh was hosting around 1.3 million Rohingyas and that their prolonged presence was putting considerable pressure on the country’s economy and environment.

“While humanitarian assistance to the Rohingyas is important, their safe, voluntary and dignified repatriation is the only sustainable solution to the crisis. The crisis originated in Myanmar, and its solution also lies in Myanmar,” the premier said.

Canada’s Secretary of State for International Development agreed on the importance of peaceful, safe and dignified return of the Rohingyas. The meeting also discussed renewable energy, canal excavation, tree plantation and climate financing. Sarai said Canada was interested in providing C$13 billion in climate financing globally over the next five years, noting that Bangladesh could benefit from the initiative.

Canada also expressed interest in supporting feasibility studies for development projects in Bangladesh. The discussions also covered the government’s Family Card initiative and poverty reduction. Referring to World Bank estimates, the prime minister said better-targeted social assistance, including through the Family Card, could help lift an additional 28.5 Lakhs people out of poverty.

He stressed the importance of promoting economic self-reliance through income generation and employment opportunities alongside social protection programmes. Sarai praised the contributions of Bangladeshis and Canadians of Bangladeshi origin living in Canada, highlighting their initiative, skills and positive outlook, noting that two Canadians of Bangladeshi origin were serving as members of the Canadian Parliament.

At the end of the meeting, Sarai invited the Prime Minister to visit Canada. State Minister for Foreign Affairs Shama Obaed Islam, Prime Minister’s Adviser on Education, Expatriates’ Welfare and Overseas Employment Mahdi Amin, Press Secretary AAM Saleh Shibly and other relevant officials were present. Canadian High Commissioner to Bangladesh Ajit Singh and other senior Canadian officials also attended the meeting.

NEW DELHI — Indian authorities detained protesters, opposition figures and journalists in Delhi ahead of a demonstration demanding the resignation of the country’s election chief, according to a Reuters report. Security restrictions were imposed in parts of the capital ahead of the protest, which centers on allegations concerning revisions to voter lists and the independence of India’s electoral process.

Opposition figures and critics have alleged that changes to voter rolls could unfairly benefit the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). The Election Commission has disputed criticism of its electoral procedures. The protest adds to tensions over electoral transparency and the role of India’s election authorities, an issue with implications for public confidence in the country’s democratic institutions.

The allegations remain contested, and claims of political interference should be assessed against documentary evidence and responses from the Election Commission and the government. The developments have drawn attention to the balance between maintaining public order and protecting freedom of expression, peaceful assembly and press freedom in the world’s most populous country.

Shibbir Ahmed, Washington DC — U.S. President Donald Trump has claimed he should have received the Nobel Peace Prize, calling the award “forever discredited” after former International Criminal Court judge Navi Pillay was named this year’s laureate. In a Truth Social post Friday following a rally in Syracuse, New York, Trump repeated his claim that he had “settled eight Wars” and said he was close to resolving two more conflicts involving Iran and Russia’s war against Ukraine.

“The United States of America, represented by me, as your President, should have received the Nobel Peace Prize, but didn’t,” Trump wrote. He also criticized Norway over the decision and questioned Pillay’s qualifications, accusing her of being hostile toward Israel.

Pillay, a South African jurist, previously served as a judge at the International Criminal Court and as the United Nations high commissioner for human rights. She also chaired a UN commission that concluded Israel had committed genocide in Gaza, a finding strongly rejected by the Israeli government.

Trump argued that international organizations had played no role in the conflicts he says he helped resolve. Pillay previously joked that she might share the prize with Trump after learning of the award.

Last year, Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado presented Trump with her Nobel Peace Prize medal. However, the Norwegian Nobel Committee clarified that presenting the physical medal does not transfer the award or laureate status to another person. The committee has emphasized that the Nobel Peace Prize remains officially linked to the individual or organization selected by the committee.

DHAKA — Prime Minister Tarique Rahman has assured researchers of government support for a project to produce fuel oil from human waste, sewage, kitchen waste and agricultural residues. The prime minister gave the assurance on Saturday after viewing a demonstration of the technology at his office in Tejgaon, according to his Deputy Press Secretary Md Suzauddhowla (Sujan Mahmud).

Khulna University of Engineering and Technology (KUET) Professor Dr Md Khalekuzzaman briefed the prime minister on the research, its progress and the prospects for commercial production. The researchers have been developing the technology for nearly a decade using Hydrothermal Liquefaction (HTL), a process that converts wet organic waste into biocrude under high temperature and pressure.

Laboratory tests have reportedly achieved biocrude yields of 50 to 55 percent, with further progress in producing diesel-rich biocrude. The next step is to establish a pilot plant capable of processing one to three tonnes of waste daily to evaluate production efficiency, costs and commercial viability. The proposed facility is estimated to cost Tk 100 crore to Tk 120 crore.

According to the researchers, successful commercial-scale implementation could eventually replace 10 to 15 percent of Bangladesh’s imported crude oil and save an estimated Tk 6,500 crore to Tk 13,000 crore in foreign exchange annually.

However, the researchers acknowledged that these projections depend on successful scale-up and assessments of the technology’s economic viability. They said the project could help reduce fuel import dependence, improve waste management, curb environmental pollution and create opportunities for a domestic fuel industry.

Power and Energy Minister Iqbal Hassan Mahmood Tuku, State Minister Aninda Islam Amit, University Grants Commission member Professor Dr Abdullah-Al-Mamun, KUET Vice-Chancellor Professor Muhammad Masud and Bangladesh Petroleum Corporation Chairman Dr Md Rafiqul Islam were also present at the demonstration.